Page 12 - tctcissue4
P. 12

REVIEW of FINANCE - Issue 4, 2022
               X   represents  the  list  of  explanatory  variables   less-restrictive  regulatory  environment  stand  out  as  the
                 k
                it
           that  are  included  in  their  logarithmic  form  in  the   major  FDI-promoting  institutional  factors. Also,  there  is
           empirical equation                                 empirical evidence that the effects of EF sub-components
               X  represents the list of explanatory variables that are   on  FDI  inflows  exhibit  variations  through  the  economic
                l
                it
           included as ratios or rates in the empirical equation, and   characteristics of the host countries and across geo-economic
           εit is the stochastic error term.                  regions. The results suggest that governments should pursue
              Ghazalian and Amponsem (2019) empirically examine   EF-improving policies, which should be tailored according
           the  effects  of  EF  on  inward  FDI  flows  (henceforth,  FDI   to the economic and geo-economic characteristics of the host
           inflows), and determine the effects of EF sub-components   countries, to increase FDI inflows.
           on FDI inflows. This paper examines the effects of EF and its
           sub-components reflecting the Quality of Institutions (QIs) on   References:
           FDI inflows, using indices derived from the Fraser Institute   1.  Azman-Saini, W. N. W., A. Z. Baharumshah, and S. H. Law. (2010). Foreign Direct
           and from the Heritage Foundation. The empirical analysis   Investment, EF and Economic Growth: International Evidence. Economic Modelling,
           uses a panel dataset covering 120 developed and developing   27(5), 1079–1089.
           countries over the time period 1970–2015 when using the   2.  Bénassy-Quéré, A., M. Coupet, and T. Mayer. (2007). Institutional Determinants of
           Fraser Institute’s EF data, and 146 countries over the time   Foreign Direct Investment. The World Economy, 30 (5), 764–782.
           period 1995–2016 when using the Heritage Foundation’s EF   3.  Bengoa, M., & Sanchez-Robles, B. (2003). Foreign direct investment, EF and
           data. The empirical analysis is carried out for a panel dataset   growth: new evidence from Latin America. European journal of political economy,
           using different econometric methodologies and empirical   19(3), 529-545.
           specifications. The results underline positive effects of EF   4.  Borensztein, E., J. De Gregorio, and J. W. Lee. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment
           on FDI inflows. They reveal that EF sub-components have   Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115–135.
           varying impacts on FDI inflows, where rule of law, market   5.  Bosworth, B. and CollIns, S. M. (1999). ‘Capital Flows to Developing Economies:
           openness, and less-restrictive regulatory environment stand   6.  Implications for Saving and Investment’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,
           out as the major FDI-promoting institutional factors. Also,   30(1), pp.143–180.
           there is an empirical evidence that the effects of EF sub-  7.  Cabello, J. M., Ruiz, F., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2021). An alternative aggregation
           components on FDI inflows exhibit variations through the   process for composite indexes: An application to the Heritage Foundation EF Index.
           economic characteristics of the host countries and across   Social Indicators Research, 153(2), 443-467.
           geo-economic regions.                              8.  Dunning, J. H. (2008). ‘Decade Award Location and the multinational enterprise’,
              Singh and Gal (2020) used Heritage Foundation EF   9.  Journal of International Business Studies. Palgrave Macmillan Journals,
           index data over the period of 1999 to 2018 and employ   40(1), pp. 20– 34.
           the  stepwise  multi  regression  on  variables  of  business   10. Fofana, M. F. (2014). ‘The influence of measures of EF on FDI: A comparison of
           freedom, government spending, tax burden, government   Western Europe and Sub-Saharan Africa’, Global Economy Journal, 14(3–4),
           integrity,  property  rights,  investment  freedom,  trade   pp. 399–424.
           freedom and monetary freedom. The results show that   11. Fry,  J.  (1993).  ‘Foreign  Direct  Investment  in  a  Macroeconomic  Framework’,
           EF has a significant positive impact in South Asia, Latin   The worldbank.
           America, East Asia, North Europe and West Europe.   12. Ghazalian, P. L., & Amponsem, F. (2019). The effects of EF on FDI inflows: An
              However, for the Middle East and North Africa, East   empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 51(11), 1111-1132.
           European  and  South  European  economies,  EF  has  an   13. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and P. Zoido-Lobatón (1999). “Aggregating Governance
           insignificant influence on FDI inflow. Interestingly, trade   Indicators.” Research WorkingPaper No. 2195, World Bank, Washington, DC.
           freedom is the only variable which positively significant   14. Lily, J. et al. (2014). ‘Exchange Rate Movement and Foreign Direct Investment in
           in the maximum economies of South Asia, Sub-Saharan   Asean Economies’, Economics Research International, 2014(March), pp. 1–10.
           Africa, East Europe and the Middle East and North Africa.   15. Miles, M. A., K. R. Holmes, M. A. O’Grady, A. I. Eiras, B. D. Schaefer, and A. B. Kim.
           This  illuminates  that  investor-friendly  trade  openness   (2006). 2006 Index of EF. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
           policy and relaxes in tariffs, trade quotas, and export taxes   16. Quazi, R. (2007). EF and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia. Journal of the Asia
           are increasing FDI inflow in South Asia, Sub Saharan Africa,   Pacific Economy 12(3), 329–344.
           Eastern Europe and the Middle East and North Africa.   17. Singh, D., & Gal, Z. (2020). EF and its impact on foreign direct investment: Global
           However, single variables such as government spending   overview. Review of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 73-90.
           and  investment  freedom  are  positively  significant  and   18. Subasat, T. (2011). ‘EF and Foreign Direct Investment: A Panel Gravity Model
           have a positive impact on FDI inflow in Southern Europe.  Approach’, The Empercal Economics Letters, 10(7), pp. 698–704.
                                                              19. Tiwari, A. K. (2011). ‘Foreign Aid, FDI, EF and Economic Growth in Asian Countries’,
           Conclusion
                                                                Global Economy Journal Volume, 11(3), pp. 1–26.
              This paper reviewed basic contents related to EF Index
           and its impact on FDI. In summary, the results underline   Author’s Information:
           the positive effects of EF on FDI inflows. The studies reveal   Nguyen Thi Kim Chi, Tran Thi Mo
           that EF Index and EF sub-components have varying impacts  Faculty of Taxation - Customs, University of Finance Marketing
           on FDI inflows, where rule of law, market openness, and  Email: Kimchi@ufm.edu.vn

                                                                                                           11
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17