Page 9 - tctcissue4
P. 9

ECONOMIC FREEDOM INDEX AND ITS IMPACT ON FOREIGN


          DIRECT INVESTMENT: REVIEWING THE LITERATURE


          NGUYEN THI KIM CHI, TRAN THI MO

          Abstract: Economic freedom (EF) is considered symbolic criteria for a business-friendly environment. To attract foreign direct
          investment (FDI), EF is an important key priority. Composite indices of EF may constitute a useful and practical guide and a significant
          source of information for experts in government policy, investors and market researchers across the world. Their high applicability
          and the important consequences of the relative position of the countries in a ranking of EF have led many practitioners and academic
          researchers to open a debate about some methodological aspects in the construction of these indices. In this paper, we will focus on
          the aggregation processes used to build the composite indicator, and we will make use of the data of the index of EF published by the
          Heritage Foundation. Hence, the contribution of the paper is to contribute to the literature that examines the impact of EF on FDI.

          Keywords: EF, EF Index, Foreign direct investment,  the Heritage Foundation.
          Received: September 8 , 2022                       Hence, the contribution of the paper is to contribute to the
                        th
                      th
          Revised: October 16 , 2022                         literature that examines the impact of EF on FDI.
          Accepted: December 3 , 2022
                        rd
                                                             The basic conceptual framework
          Introduction
                                                              The impact of EF on FDI
            According  to  the  Heritage  Foundation,  EF  is  the
          fundamental right of every human to control his or her   EF has been identified as a key determinant in attracting
          labor  and  property.  In  an  economically  free  society,   FDI (Kaufmann et al., 1999; Habib and Zurawicki, 2002;
          individuals  are  free  to  work,  produce,  consume,  and   Bengoa and Sanchez-Robles, 2003; Bénassy-Quéré  et al.,
          invest  in  any  way  they  please.  In  economically  free   2007;  Quazi,  2007;  Azman-Saini  et  al.,  2010).  EF  could
          societies,  governments  allow  labor,  capital,  and  goods   exercise a direct promoting effect on economic growth, and
          to move freely and refrain from coercion or constraint   an indirect effect on economic growth through its positive
          of  liberty  beyond  the  extent  necessary  to  protect  and   impacts on inward FDI (De Haan and Sturm, 2000).
          maintain liberty itself.                             Higher  levels  of  EF  would  motivate  individuals  and
            FDI is very crucial for countries because it helps in   firms by stimulating their economic incentives and would
          accumulating capital as the source of investment, creates   lead to an efficient allocation of resources. According to the
          jobs, increases competition in a country and is the biggest   Heritage Foundation (Miles et al., 2006), EF is “… the absence
          of  all  transfers  technology  to  the  host  country.  FDI  is   of government coercion or constraint on the production,
          regarded as an engine for growth in the host country and   distribution, or consumption of goods and services beyond
          hence has a significant importance. In addition, according   the extent necessary for citizens to protect and maintain
          to OECD, FDI is referred to as an investment made by   liberty itself.”
          a  resident  entity  in  one  economy  to  hold  a  long-term   Bénassy-Quéré  et  al.  (2007)  indicate  that  lower
          interest in an institution located in another country. The   levels of EF and poor institutions in the host countries
          ownership referred to here should at least be 10% of the   would  generate  supplementary  costs  for  MNEs  and,
          voting right which shows the power and authority of the   consequently, would lead to decreases in inward FDI.
          investor (OECD).                                     EF  is  considered  symbolic  criteria  for  a  business-
            In  recent  years,  researchers  have  illuminated  the   friendly  environment.  However,  the  characteristic  of
          relation between EF and FDI inflow with consideration   significant EF changes according to the regions. To attract
          of specific geographically grouped economies. There are   FDI, EF is an important key priority. Countries' EF ranking
          available  indices  that  measure  EF  levels,  but  the  most   rises  and  declines  due  to  a  single  country's  economic
          commonly used EF indices in the empirical literature are   efforts (Heritage Foundation, 2018). According to Tiwari
          the ones constructed by the Fraser Institute and by the   (2011), the majority of empirical literature presents the
          Heritage Foundation. These indices are characterized by   relation between economic growth, EF and FDI inflow.
          a relatively long period of coverage, and by a broader   EF Index and EF sub-component
          scope and a wider country coverage. In this paper, we
          will focus on the aggregation processes used to build the   According to the Heritage Foundation, the principles
          composite indicator, and we will make use of the data of   of  EF  are  measured  in  the  EF  Index,  an  annual  guide
          the index of EF published by the Heritage Foundation.   published  by  The  Heritage  Foundation,  Washington's

           8
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14